Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Illustration of Warren Buffett

The Three Things Warren Buffett Looks for in a Company

Warren Buffett is often described as the world’s greatest investor, but that description can be misleading. It makes his success sound technical or inaccessible – as if it rests on secret formulas or elite financial insight. In truth, Buffett’s approach is almost disarmingly simple. He looks for a small number of fundamental qualities, applies them consistently, and then waits.

For those new to investing, this simplicity can feel suspicious. Surely beating the market for decades must involve something more sophisticated? But Buffett’s genius lies not in complexity, but in discipline. He resists distraction. He ignores noise. And he returns, again and again, to three core questions before investing a single dollar.

1. Does the business have a durable advantage?

Buffett’s first concern is not growth, innovation, or hype. It is durability.

He wants to know whether a company has what he famously calls a “moat” – a structural advantage that protects it from competitors over long periods of time. Just as a castle’s moat makes it difficult to attack, a business moat makes profits hard to erode.

This advantage can take many forms:

  • a powerful brand that customers trust instinctively,
  • a cost structure competitors can’t match,
  • network effects that make the product more valuable as more people use it,
  • or regulatory barriers that prevent easy entry.

Coca-Cola is a classic Buffett example. It doesn’t have cutting-edge technology. Its product hasn’t changed much in decades. But its brand recognition, distribution network, and emotional connection with consumers create a moat that few rivals can cross.

For beginners, this is an important shift in thinking. Investing is often framed as predicting the future – spotting the next big thing. Buffett does the opposite. He asks whether the company will still be strong even if the future is uncertain. He prefers businesses that don’t need constant reinvention just to survive.

If a company’s success depends on staying one step ahead of competitors every year, Buffett tends to walk away.

2. Is the business understandable?

Buffett has a well-known rule: “Never invest in a business you cannot understand.”

This doesn’t mean the business must be simple in an absolute sense – insurance companies and railroads are not simple – but it must be simple to him. He wants to understand how the company makes money, what drives its costs, and what could realistically go wrong.

This idea is often misunderstood by newer investors. It’s easy to assume that understanding can be outsourced – to analysts, fund managers, or financial models. Buffett disagrees. He believes that if you don’t understand the business yourself, you can’t judge risk properly.

This is why he avoided technology stocks for much of his career. Not because technology is bad, but because rapid change makes long-term outcomes harder to see clearly. Only later, when companies like Apple demonstrated stable ecosystems and predictable consumer behaviour, did they enter his circle of competence.

For everyday investors, this sets a clear boundary. You don’t have to understand every business. You only have to understand the ones you choose to own.

Buffett’s success owes as much to what he doesn’t invest in as what he does.

3. Is management rational and trustworthy?

The third element Buffett looks for is often overlooked, yet it may be the most human: management quality.

Buffett is acutely aware that even a great business can be ruined by poor leadership. He looks for managers who are:

  • honest with shareholders,
  • disciplined with capital,
  • willing to admit mistakes,
  • and focused on long-term value rather than short-term headlines.

One of his strongest signals is how managers use excess cash. Do they reinvest it wisely? Return it to shareholders? Or chase acquisitions simply to appear busy or ambitious?

Buffett is deeply sceptical of executives who overpromise. He prefers managers who understate and overdeliver, who speak plainly, and who treat shareholders as partners rather than customers.

This emphasis on character can surprise beginners, who often expect investing to be purely numerical. But Buffett has long argued that numbers are shaped by people. Incentives, ego, fear, and patience all matter – sometimes more than spreadsheets.

In his letters to shareholders, Buffett repeatedly returns to this point: you are not buying a stock ticker, you are buying a slice of a business run by real humans.

But how can ordinary investors judge management quality, especially when they never meet the people running the company?

Buffett’s answer is disarmingly practical. He does not rely on charisma, media profiles, or bold vision statements. Instead, he watches behaviour over time. What managers do matters far more than what they say.

One place to start is shareholder communication. Buffett reads annual reports and letters carefully, not for spin, but for tone. Do executives speak plainly, or hide behind jargon? Do they acknowledge mistakes, or quietly rewrite the past? Managers who are honest tend to be specific about what went wrong – and clear about what they learned.

Capital allocation is another crucial signal. When a company generates excess cash, management must decide how to use it. Reinvesting in the core business, paying dividends, or buying back shares can all be sensible choices if they are well reasoned. What worries Buffett is empire-building – acquisitions made to look busy, expand influence, or chase growth for its own sake. Over time, these decisions leave a paper trail in financial statements.

Incentives also tell a story. Buffett pays close attention to how executives are rewarded. Are bonuses tied to long-term performance, or short-term share price movements? Are managers heavily invested in their own company, or mainly paid in cash regardless of outcomes? Alignment matters. Leaders who think like owners tend to behave like owners.

Simplicity as an advantage

Taken together, these three ideas form a philosophy rather than a formula. Buffett is not searching for perfection. He is searching for businesses that are strong, comprehensible, and well run – and then buying them at sensible prices.

For beginners, the lesson is not to copy Buffett’s portfolio, but to copy his restraint. He waits. He resists trends that others feel pressured to follow.

In an age of constant market noise, that restraint may be his greatest edge.

Buffett once remarked that investing should be “simple, but not easy.” The simplicity lies in the principles. The difficulty lies in sticking to them when excitement, fear, or fashion pull you elsewhere.

For those just starting out, that may be the most valuable insight of all.

Share this article
newtimes
newtimes
Articles: 49

Smart information, lasting results — subscribe for free.